Генеративный искусственный интеллект. Как ИИ меняет нашу жизнь и работу: читать книгу онлайн полностью и бесплатно

18. 2625, «ChatGPT-Dan-Jailbreak.md». Gist. https://gist.github.com/coolaj86/6f4f7b30129b0251f61fa7baaa881516.

19. A. Roberts, «Exploring Prompt Injection Attacks». NCC Group Research Blog, Dec. 05, 2022. https://research.nccgroup.com/2022/12/05/exploring-prompt-injection-attacks/.

20. «Not what you’ve signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM – Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.12173.pdf.

21. «Prompt Injections are bad, mkay?» https://greshake.github.io/.

22. «GitHub – greshake/llm-security: New ways of breaking app-integrated LLMs». GitHub. https://github.com/greshake/llm-security.

23. M. Burgess, «The Hacking of ChatGPT Is Just Getting Started». WIRED, Apr. 13, 2023. https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-jailbreak-generative-ai-hacking/.

24. «DBIR Report 2022 – Master’s Guide». Verizon Business. https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/2022/master-guide/.

25. «Facebook [131] IO Threat Report». https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/IO-Threat-Report-May‐20–2021.pdf.

26. «Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigations». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.04246.pdf.

27. «Information Disorder». https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report-version-august‐2018/16808c9c77.

28. «The Global Disinformation Index». https://www.disinformationindex.org/research/2020–10–1‐bankrolling-bigotry-an-overview-of-the-online-funding-strategies-of-american-hate-groups/.

29. «Misinformation on Bard, Google’s new AI chat – Center for Countering Digital Hate». Center for Countering Digital Hate | CCDH, Apr. 05, 2023. https://counterhate.com/research/misinformation-on-bard-google-ai-chat/.

30. «The Next Great Misinformation Superspreader: How ChatGPT Could Spread Toxic Misinformation At Unprecedented Scale». NewsGuard, Jan. 24, 2023. https://www.newsguardtech.com/misinformation-monitor/jan‐2023.

31. The, «Opinion: This Video May Not Be Real». The New York Times, The New York Times, Aug. 14, 2019. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/14/opinion/deepfakes-adele-disinformation.html.

32. «Operation #FFS: Fake Face Swarm». https://public-assets.graphika.com/reports/graphika_report_operation_ffs_fake_face_storm.pdf.

33. S. I. Observatory, «Analysis of Twitter Takedowns Linked to Cuba, the Internet Research Agency, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand». https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/news/twitter-takedown-october‐2020.

34. B. Strick, «West Papua: New Online Influence Operation Attempts to Sway Independence Debate». bellingcat, Nov. 11, 2020. https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2020/11/11/west-papua-new-online-influence-operation-attempts-to-sway-independence-debate/.

35. N. Deen, «CHI 2023: Misinformation Detection Models are Vulnerable to ChatGPT and Other LLMs». https://www.cc.gatech.edu/news/chi‐2023‐misinformation-detection-models-are-vulnerable-chatgpt-and-other-llms.

36. «On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.13661.pdf.

37. «10 Recommendations by the Taskforce on Disinformation and the War in Ukraine». EDMO. https://edmo.eu/2022/06/29/10‐recommendations-by-the-taskforce-on-disinformation-and-the-war-in-ukraine/.

38. «New research shows successes in teaching „lateral reading“ techniques». Center for an Informed Public, Dec. 07, 2021. https://www.cip.uw.edu/2021/12/07/lateral-reading-canada-civix-study/.

39. «SIFT (The Four Moves)». Hapgood, Jun. 19, 2019. https://hapgood.us/2019/06/19/sift-the-four-moves/.

40. S. Jeong, «Opinion: Politicians Want to Change the Internet’s Most Important Law. They Should Read It First». The New York Times, The New York Times, Jul. 26, 2019. (Онлайн). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/26/opinion/section‐230‐political-neutrality.html.

41. «47 U. S. Code 230 – Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material». LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230.

42. S. Goldman, «Could Big Tech be liable for generative AI output? Hypothetically „yes“, says Supreme Court justice». VentureBeat, Feb. 21, 2023. https://venturebeat.com/ai/could-big-tech-be-liable-for-generative-ai-output-hypothetically-yes-says-supreme-court-justice/.

43. C. Lima and D. DiMolfetta, «AI chatbots won’t enjoy tech’s legal shield, Section 230 authors say». The Washington Post, The Washington Post, Mar. 17, 2023. (Онлайн). https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/17/ai-chatbots-wont-enjoy-techs-legal-shield-section‐230‐authors-say/.

44. «Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled». https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.00650.pdf.

45. «Unsupervised and Distributional Detection of Machine-Generated Text». https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.02878.pdf.

46. W. Zhong et al., «Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of Text» in Proceedings of the 202 °Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Nov. 2020, pp. 2461–2470. doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.193.

47. «Deep learning for fake news detection: A comprehensive survey». AI Open, vol. 3, pp. 133–155, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.09.001.

[131] Принадлежит организации Meta, которая признана экстремистской и запрещена на территории РФ.